Skip to content

Add "Available Transports" to Core dev doc #12121

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
lmazuel opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Add "Available Transports" to Core dev doc #12121

lmazuel opened this issue Jun 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@xiangyan99
Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Milestone
[2020] July

Comments

@lmazuel
Copy link
Member

lmazuel commented Jun 18, 2020

With the table of kwarg/operation level, like we did for Available Policies:
https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-python/blob/master/sdk/core/azure-core/CLIENT_LIBRARY_DEVELOPER.md#available-policies

See also #12102 (customer was looking for "session" kwargs in the RequestTransport)
@lmazuel lmazuel added Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library. Azure.Core labels Jun 18, 2020
@lmazuel lmazuel added this to the [2020] July milestone Jun 18, 2020
@lmazuel lmazuel changed the title Add "Available Transport" to Core dev doc Add "Available Transports" to Core dev doc Jun 18, 2020
@lmazuel lmazuel mentioned this issue Jun 18, 2020
Closed
@lmazuel lmazuel closed this as completed Jul 7, 2020
@jbulow
Copy link

jbulow commented Feb 9, 2021

The session parameter is still not visible in the documentation.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@xiangyan99 xiangyan99

Labels
Azure.Core Client This issue points to a problem in the data-plane of the library.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
[2020] July
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jbulow @lmazuel @xiangyan99