Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Bug: blockVitest should remove Jest and Mocha dependencies #1889

Closed
3 tasks done
JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1892
Closed
3 tasks done

🐛 Bug: blockVitest should remove Jest and Mocha dependencies #1889

JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Jan 16, 2025 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1892
Assignees
Labels
status: accepting prs Please, send a pull request to resolve this! type: bug Something isn't working :(

Comments

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Owner

Bug Report Checklist

  • I have tried restarting my IDE and the issue persists.
  • I have pulled the latest main branch of the repository.
  • I have searched for related issues and found none that matched my issue.

Expected

The block is supposed to migrate from Jest and Mocha, including removing config files and deleting package dependencies.

Actual

It only removes config files so far, not deleting package dependencies.

Additional Info

Prototyped in #1839.

https://github.com/JoshuaKGoldberg/create-typescript-app/pull/1839/files#diff-376a41f97c1c7a54eebb60ab263a1dade96b38916fa472b2514a1a32098b556cR474-R480

I wrote https://github.com/JoshuaKGoldberg/remove-dependencies for this.

💖

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added status: accepting prs Please, send a pull request to resolve this! type: bug Something isn't working :( labels Jan 16, 2025
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg self-assigned this Jan 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: accepting prs Please, send a pull request to resolve this! type: bug Something isn't working :(
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant