Skip to content

makes sense to have hasReply #116

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
derberg opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

makes sense to have hasReply #116

derberg opened this issue Apr 8, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@derberg
Copy link
Member

derberg commented Apr 8, 2024

use case https://github.com/asyncapi/markdown-template/pull/523/files#diff-a77ecd4c1f96130ae45b0bf71058686ad44f1b381f5f87fd567dddb83eea3558

better than doing operation.reply() !== undefined

maybe even operation.type() would make sense, to return not only send or receive but other type depending if reply is there

Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Mar 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant