|
| 1 | +# Bootc Project Governance |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +The Bootc project is dedicated to providing transactional, in-place operating system updates using OCI/Docker container images. |
| 4 | +This governance explains how the project is run. |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +- [Values](#values) |
| 7 | +- [Maintainers](#maintainers) |
| 8 | +- [Becoming a Maintainer](#becoming-a-maintainer) |
| 9 | +- [Meetings](#meetings) |
| 10 | +- [CNCF Resources](#cncf-resources) |
| 11 | +- [Code of Conduct Enforcement](#code-of-conduct) |
| 12 | +- [Security Response Team](#security-response-team) |
| 13 | +- [Voting](#voting) |
| 14 | +- [Modifications](#modifying-this-charter) |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Values |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +The Bootc and its leadership embrace the following values: |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +* Openness: Communication and decision-making happens in the open and is discoverable for future |
| 21 | + reference. As much as possible, all discussions and work take place in public |
| 22 | + forums and open repositories. |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +* Fairness: All stakeholders have the opportunity to provide feedback and submit |
| 25 | + contributions, which will be considered on their merits. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +* Community over Product or Company: Sustaining and growing our community takes |
| 28 | + priority over shipping code or sponsors' organizational goals. Each |
| 29 | + contributor participates in the project as an individual. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +* Inclusivity: We innovate through different perspectives and skill sets, which |
| 32 | + can only be accomplished in a welcoming and respectful environment. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +* Participation: Responsibilities within the project are earned through |
| 35 | + participation, and there is a clear path up the contributor ladder into leadership |
| 36 | + positions. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +## Maintainers |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +Bootc Maintainers have "gated" write acess to the [project GitHub repository](https://github.com/bootc-dev/bootc). |
| 41 | +The current maintainers can be found in [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md). |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +Direct pushes to the code is never allowed. All pull requests require review by a maintainer |
| 44 | +*other* than the one submitting it. "Large" changes are encouraged to have a tracking |
| 45 | +issue filed beforehand and gather consensus from multiple maintainers and interested community. |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | +Maintainers collectively manage the project's resources and contributors. |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +This privilege is granted with some expectation of responsibility: maintainers |
| 50 | +are people who care about the Bootc project and want to help it grow and |
| 51 | +improve. A maintainer is not just someone who can make changes, but someone who |
| 52 | +has demonstrated their ability to collaborate with the team, get the most |
| 53 | +knowledgeable people to review code and docs, contribute high-quality code, and |
| 54 | +follow through to fix issues (in code or tests). |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | +A maintainer is a contributor to the project's success and a citizen helping |
| 57 | +the project succeed. |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +The collective team of all Maintainers is known as the Maintainer Council, which |
| 60 | +is the governing body for the project. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +### Becoming a Maintainer |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +To become a Maintainer you need to demonstrate the following: |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + * commitment to the project: |
| 67 | + * participate in discussions, contributions, code and documentation reviews for 6 months or more, |
| 68 | + * perform reviews for 20 non-trivial pull requests, |
| 69 | + * contribute 10 non-trivial pull requests and have them merged, |
| 70 | + * ability to write quality code and/or documentation, |
| 71 | + * ability to collaborate with the team, |
| 72 | + * understanding of how the team works (policies, processes for testing and code review, etc), |
| 73 | + * understanding of the project's code base and coding and documentation style. |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +A new Maintainer must be proposed by an existing maintainer by opening a PR against the [MAINTAINERS.md](./MAINTAINERS.md), which will prompt a [gitvote](https://github.com/cncf/gitvote). A simple majority vote of existing Maintainers |
| 76 | +approves the application. Maintainers nominations will be evaluated without prejudice |
| 77 | +to employer or demographics. |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +Maintainers who are selected will be granted the necessary GitHub rights. |
| 80 | + |
| 81 | +### Removing a Maintainer |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Maintainers may resign at any time if they feel that they will not be able to |
| 84 | +continue fulfilling their project duties. |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +Maintainers may also be removed after being inactive, failure to fulfill their |
| 87 | +Maintainer responsibilities, violating the Code of Conduct, or other reasons. |
| 88 | +Inactivity is defined as a period of very low or no activity in the project |
| 89 | +for a year or more, with no definite schedule to return to full Maintainer |
| 90 | +activity. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +A Maintainer may be removed at any time by a 2/3 vote of the remaining maintainers. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +Depending on the reason for removal, a Maintainer may be converted to Emeritus |
| 95 | +status. Emeritus Maintainers will still be consulted on some project matters, |
| 96 | +and can be rapidly returned to Maintainer status if their availability changes. |
| 97 | +This requires two votes from active maintainers. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +## Meetings |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +Time zones permitting, Maintainers are expected to participate in the public |
| 102 | +developer meeting, which occurs at 3:30 PM ET on Thursdays via [Zoom](TODO). |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | +Maintainers will also have closed meetings in order to discuss security reports |
| 105 | +or Code of Conduct violations. Such meetings should be scheduled by any |
| 106 | +Maintainer on receipt of a security issue or CoC report. All current Maintainers |
| 107 | +must be invited to such closed meetings, except for any Maintainer who is |
| 108 | +accused of a CoC violation. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +## CNCF Resources |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +Any Maintainer may suggest a request for CNCF resources, either in the |
| 113 | +[bootc discussions](https://github.com/bootc-dev/bootc/discussions), or during a |
| 114 | +meeting. A simple majority of Maintainers approves the request. The Maintainers |
| 115 | +may also choose to delegate working with the CNCF to non-Maintainer community |
| 116 | +members, who will then be added to the [CNCF's Maintainer List](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/project-maintainers.csv) |
| 117 | +for that purpose. |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +## Code of Conduct |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +[Code of Conduct](https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/main/code-of-conduct.md) |
| 122 | +violations by community members will be discussed and resolved |
| 123 | +by the maintainers privately. If a Maintainer is directly involved |
| 124 | +in the report, the Maintainers will instead designate two Maintainers to work |
| 125 | +with the CNCF Code of Conduct Committee in resolving it. |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +## Security Response Team |
| 128 | + |
| 129 | +The Maintainers will appoint a Security Response Team to handle security reports. |
| 130 | +This committee may simply consist of the Maintainer Council themselves. If this |
| 131 | +responsibility is delegated, the Maintainers will appoint a team of at least two |
| 132 | +contributors to handle it. The Maintainers will review who is assigned to this |
| 133 | +at least once a year. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +The Security Response Team is responsible for handling all reports of security |
| 136 | +holes and breaches according to the [security policy](./SECURITY.md). |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +## Voting |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +While most business in Bootc is conducted by "[lazy consensus](https://community.apache.org/committers/lazyConsensus.html)", |
| 141 | +periodically the Maintainers may need to vote on specific actions or changes. |
| 142 | +A vote can be taken using [gitvote](https://github.com/cncf/gitvote) or |
| 143 | +privately for security or conduct matters. Any Maintainer may demand a vote be taken. |
| 144 | + |
| 145 | +Most votes require a simple majority of all Maintainers to succeed, except where |
| 146 | +otherwise noted. Two-thirds majority votes mean at least two-thirds of all |
| 147 | +existing maintainers. |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +## Modifying this Charter |
| 150 | + |
| 151 | +Changes to this Governance and its supporting documents may be approved by |
| 152 | +a 2/3 vote of the Maintainers. |
0 commit comments