Skip to content

diagnostic for deprecated lint reference in analysis_options #35291

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pq opened this issue Nov 29, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

diagnostic for deprecated lint reference in analysis_options #35291

pq opened this issue Nov 29, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package devexp-warning Issues with the analyzer's Warning codes legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Nov 29, 2018

Follow-up from: #57794, we should flag uses of deprecated lints in analysis_options.
@pq pq added legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. devexp-warning Issues with the analyzer's Warning codes devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug labels Nov 29, 2018
@pq pq mentioned this issue Nov 29, 2018
Closed
@pq
Copy link
Member Author

pq commented Nov 30, 2018

https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/85648

@pq
Copy link
Member Author

pq commented Nov 30, 2018

Landed on the analyzer branch as https://dart.googlesource.com/sdk/+/45bf7e9906d114ee68bd21dd316420a170080348.

@pq pq closed this as completed Nov 30, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package devexp-warning Issues with the analyzer's Warning codes legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@pq