Skip to content

deprecate / remove prefer_bool_in_asserts #57829

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
pq opened this issue Nov 18, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

deprecate / remove prefer_bool_in_asserts #57829

pq opened this issue Nov 18, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug

Comments

@pq
Copy link
Member

pq commented Nov 18, 2018

Since prefer_bool_in_asserts is obsolete in Dart 2, we should minimally document it as such. Once we have a process for deprecation (#1179) and removal, we should go ahead with that too.
@pq pq added type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation labels Nov 18, 2018
@srawlins
Copy link
Member

Duplicate of #57809

@pq pq closed this as completed Nov 20, 2018
@pq pq mentioned this issue Feb 5, 2019
Closed
2 tasks
@devoncarew devoncarew added devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. labels Nov 18, 2024
@devoncarew devoncarew transferred this issue from dart-archive/linter Nov 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
devexp-linter Issues with the analyzer's support for the linter package legacy-area-analyzer Use area-devexp instead. type-documentation A request to add or improve documentation type-enhancement A request for a change that isn't a bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@pq @srawlins @devoncarew