Skip to content

Any plans to add minideb support? #232

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
davesque opened this issue Oct 20, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Any plans to add minideb support? #232

davesque opened this issue Oct 20, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@davesque
Copy link

I recently ran across Bitnami's minideb image: https://github.com/bitnami/minideb

Any reason or plans to add support for this as an alternative to alpine?

@yosifkit
Copy link
Member

It would have to be an official image in order for an official image to be built FROM it.

No official images can be derived from, or depend on, non-official images

- https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/tree/20ff8e7dc48bd583ceef76a9e847b53764a4ffb1#repeatability

The Debian images already have slim variants that exclude things like docs, man pages, and locales. See also debuerreotype, the reproducible, snapshot-based Debian rootfs builder that is used to build the Debian images, and its slimify script.

$ docker images bitnami/minideb:stretch
REPOSITORY          TAG                 IMAGE ID            CREATED             SIZE
bitnami/minideb     stretch             679c75d5b023        30 hours ago        53.6MB
$ docker images debian:stretch-slim
REPOSITORY          TAG                 IMAGE ID            CREATED             SIZE
debian              stretch-slim        e004ce20eaba        11 days ago         55.2MB

We are swapping the slim images of python to be from the slim variants of Debian rather than regular ones (#233).

@davesque
Copy link
Author

Fair enough. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants