-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
[Pre4] Performance profiling for Blazor WebAssembly apps #35230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I forgot which repo the docs belong to, sorry. |
@guardrex What is the "WN article" you are referring to? |
What's New article |
I think we need an article covering the new performance profiling and memory diagnostic tooling. Putting that content under a new Blazor Performance node sounds great. I think it would help to also reference this content from the related articles in the ASP.NET Core Performance section, like from the Performance Diagnostic Tools and Memory and GC articles. |
Very well ... I'll see about getting this drafted on a PR soon. |
@guardrex let's only document the use-cases triggered via JS which triggerst the download of .nettrace file from the browser. |
I'm just about done with the draft PR. Let's strike whatever you want from the PR when it goes up. |
Description
Per dotnet/docs#45811 (cc: @pavelsavara) ...
@danroth27 ... Will we write an article to cover the Blazor WebAssembly-specific counters that would dovetail with our main doc set guidance on Performance Diagnostics?
If so, then it seems that we'll move our current Blazor node Performance article content into an overview article of a new Blazor node Performance node (folder) and add a new article here.
If not, then I assume that you just want an entry in the WN article covering this.
Page URL
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/blazor/performance?view=aspnetcore-9.0
Content source URL
https://github.com/dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs/blob/main/aspnetcore/blazor/performance.md
Document ID
40361d5d-c806-9c9b-c7f7-ad317a06bb4f
Platform Id
9236c1a9-2983-6848-be9e-2377858e3c2b
Article author
@guardrex
Metadata
Related Issues
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: