patch-package should ignore files defined in yarnclean file

[jennifer-shehane]

I'm running into an error running patch-package on a specific package. I noticed that the patch file removes a README.md file. This is due to my .yarnclean file defining *.md files for removal. So, I believe yarn install is running - removing the markdown file, then patch-package is running and becoming confused with the removal of the md file somehow?

Removing the *.md line from my .yarnclean file caused the patch to be successful: cypress-io/cypress@38469fd

I think .yarnclean is not playing well with patch-package. Maybe this should be updated to ignore files similar to how .gitignore` directories are ignored?

patch-package/src/makePatch.ts

Line 265 in bd2e9a4

writeFileSync(join(tmpRepo.name, ".gitignore"), "!/node_modules\n\n")

Error

CI error: https://app.circleci.com/pipelines/github/cypress-io/cypress/69268/workflows/ac2b9f29-e0fd-4d4c-b837-a4bc75b0a860/jobs/2847547

**ERROR** Failed to apply patch for package snap-shot-core at path
  
    node_modules/snap-shot-core

  This error was caused because patch-package cannot apply the following patch file:

    patches/snap-shot-core+10.2.4.dev.patch

  Try removing node_modules and trying again. If that doesn't work, maybe there was
  an accidental change made to the patch file? Try recreating it by manually
  editing the appropriate files and running:
  
    patch-package snap-shot-core
  
  If that doesn't work, then it's a bug in patch-package, so please submit a bug
  report. Thanks!

    https://github.com/ds300/patch-package/issues
    

---
patch-package finished with 1 error(s).
node:child_process:966
    throw err;
    ^

Error: Command failed: patch-package && lerna run rebuild-better-sqlite3 --scope @packages/server

You can see how the PR diff including removing the Readme file: https://github.com/cypress-io/cypress/pull/31449/files#diff-6d4ec7fb70a72c8193e10a8c390b904e6313087e19b3d2a191d466cc31063441

This seemed to work on other patches I made though - like here - so I'm not sure why this one failed.