-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Split reindex and update by query failures exposed on the REST interface #17539
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
>breaking
:Distributed Indexing/Reindex
Issues relating to reindex that are not caused by issues further down
>enhancement
Team:Distributed (Obsolete)
Meta label for distributed team (obsolete). Replaced by Distributed Indexing/Coordination.
Comments
I think we'd be better off standardizing on things like |
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (Team:Distributed) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>breaking
:Distributed Indexing/Reindex
Issues relating to reindex that are not caused by issues further down
>enhancement
Team:Distributed (Obsolete)
Meta label for distributed team (obsolete). Replaced by Distributed Indexing/Coordination.
Right now we expose
BulkItemResponse.Failure
andShardSearchFailures
under a singlefailures
property but these classes are of different shapes.e.g one of the failures writes the throwable as
cause
the other asreason
.It would be nice if we can expose them under
index_failures
andsearch_failures
, the way they are stored on theBulkIndexByScrollResponse
.Or come up with a single
BulkIndexByScrollResponse.Failure
I am wondering what the development guidelines/best practices are for exposing failures? We have quite a few
Failure
inner classes that do not relate to one another?cc @nik9000
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: