Skip to content

ILM and defining node types #56876

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
markwalkom opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

ILM and defining node types #56876

markwalkom opened this issue May 17, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
:Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management >docs General docs changes Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team

Comments

@markwalkom
Copy link
Contributor

In the ILM documentation we don't clearly state how the concept of hot/warm/cold nodes work - just that they can exist. This is usually done via allocation awareness, and it'd be good to get something added in the overall chapter about this.

@markwalkom markwalkom added >docs General docs changes :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management labels May 17, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team label May 17, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added the Team:Docs Meta label for docs team label May 17, 2020
@dakrone
Copy link
Member

dakrone commented Sep 29, 2020

This is going to be moot once we have #60848, so I'm going to close this for now.

@dakrone dakrone closed this as completed Sep 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management >docs General docs changes Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants