added copy to field mapping support for appropriate types #720
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Mpdreamz
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2014
added copy to field mapping support for appropriate types
|
LGTM 👍 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@Mpdreamz per our discussion on which types should support this- based on the elasticsearch source, it looks like only the string, boolean, and binary types actually parse the copy_to field. Have a look at https://github.com/elasticsearch/elasticsearch/blob/master/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/core/TypeParsers.java, parseField(...), which looks for copy_to, is only called from StringFieldMapper, BinaryFieldMapper, and BooleanFieldMapper.
Closes #708