We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Which function do you want to add comments to? Add comments to TestOptimizeDefaultForFuseWithArgs(t *testing.T) in pkg\ddc\alluxio\transform_optimization_test.go What comments do you want to add? // TestOptimizeDefaultForFuseWithArgs conducts comprehensive validation of the optimizeDefaultFuse method's behavior across distinct parameter versioning contexts // // The evaluation encompasses two principal scenarios: // // 1. Contemporary Fuse Argument Configuration (isNewFuseArgVersion=true): // - Input Profile: AlluxioRuntime specification containing fuse parameters with fuse-opts directives // - Expected Outcome: Automatic injection of mount path "/mnt/runtime" and root directory "/" arguments // - Verification Protocol: Rigorous assertion of argument list completeness including appended paths // // // // 2. Legacy Fuse Argument Configuration (isNewFuseArgVersion=false): // - Input Profile: AlluxioRuntime specification with conventional fuse parameters and fuse-opts // - Expected Outcome: Preservation of original argument structure without path injection // - Verification Protocol: Strict validation of parameter fidelity to initial configuration // // Test Case Architecture: // Each evaluation instance comprises: // - runtime: AlluxioRuntime configuration object encapsulating fuse specifications // - alluxioValue: Alluxio configuration entity with initialized empty fuse parameters // - isNewFuseArgVersion: Boolean indicator for parameter version compliance // - expectArgs: Precisely defined expected fuse argument array // // Execution Workflow: // 1. Instantiate AlluxioEngine component // 2. Execute optimizeDefaultFuse parameter transformation logic // 3. Perform deep reflective comparison between actual and expected arguments // 4. Generate diagnostic output for any detected discrepancies
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Which function do you want to add comments to?
Add comments to TestOptimizeDefaultForFuseWithArgs(t *testing.T) in pkg\ddc\alluxio\transform_optimization_test.go
What comments do you want to add?
// TestOptimizeDefaultForFuseWithArgs conducts comprehensive validation of the optimizeDefaultFuse method's behavior across distinct parameter versioning contexts
//
// The evaluation encompasses two principal scenarios:
//
// 1. Contemporary Fuse Argument Configuration (isNewFuseArgVersion=true):
// - Input Profile: AlluxioRuntime specification containing fuse parameters with fuse-opts directives
// - Expected Outcome: Automatic injection of mount path "/mnt/runtime" and root directory "/" arguments
// - Verification Protocol: Rigorous assertion of argument list completeness including appended paths
//
//
//
// 2. Legacy Fuse Argument Configuration (isNewFuseArgVersion=false):
// - Input Profile: AlluxioRuntime specification with conventional fuse parameters and fuse-opts
// - Expected Outcome: Preservation of original argument structure without path injection
// - Verification Protocol: Strict validation of parameter fidelity to initial configuration
//
// Test Case Architecture:
// Each evaluation instance comprises:
// - runtime: AlluxioRuntime configuration object encapsulating fuse specifications
// - alluxioValue: Alluxio configuration entity with initialized empty fuse parameters
// - isNewFuseArgVersion: Boolean indicator for parameter version compliance
// - expectArgs: Precisely defined expected fuse argument array
//
// Execution Workflow:
// 1. Instantiate AlluxioEngine component
// 2. Execute optimizeDefaultFuse parameter transformation logic
// 3. Perform deep reflective comparison between actual and expected arguments
// 4. Generate diagnostic output for any detected discrepancies
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: