Skip to content

[napari workflows] Review 2D & 3D image handling in napari workflows #411

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Tracked by #850
jluethi opened this issue Jun 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
Tracked by #850

Comments

@jluethi
Copy link
Collaborator

jluethi commented Jun 8, 2023

See #403 and #398

I covered some scenarios, but I'm not sure whether the "calculate a label image in napari workflows based on an actual 2D image OME-Zarr intensity image" would work as expected. I think it should (and should just be saved as an actual 2D image), but to be tested a bit further. Plus test the different interactions with expected_dimensions and if there are weird edge cases there

I should review this and check whether the napari workflows flow can be simplified.

@jluethi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jluethi commented Jun 9, 2023

Also review the napari workflow tests and see if we can increase coverage for the different 2D vs 3D scenarios

@jluethi jluethi removed their assignment Apr 24, 2024
@jluethi jluethi changed the title Review 2D & 3D image handling in napari workflows [napari workflows] Review 2D & 3D image handling in napari workflows Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant