Skip to content

go mod tidy 失败 #558

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
chowyu08 opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #559
Closed

go mod tidy 失败 #558

chowyu08 opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 1 comment · Fixed by #559

Comments

@chowyu08
Copy link

chowyu08 commented Apr 8, 2021

go: found gopkg.in/check.v1 in gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20201130134442-10cb98267c6c
go: finding module for package github.com/juju/errors
go: finding module for package github.com/cznic/mathutil
go: finding module for package github.com/pingcap/tidb/types/parser_driver
go: found github.com/cznic/mathutil in github.com/cznic/mathutil v0.0.0-20181122101859-297441e03548
go: found github.com/juju/errors in github.com/juju/errors v0.0.0-20200330140219-3fe23663418f
go: finding module for package github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft
go: finding module for package github.com/pingcap/tidb/types/parser_driver
go: found github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft in github.com/remyoudompheng/bigfft v0.0.0-20200410134404-eec4a21b6bb0
go: finding module for package github.com/pingcap/tidb/types/parser_driver
canal imports
github.com/siddontang/go-mysql/canal imports
github.com/pingcap/parser tested by
github.com/pingcap/parser.test imports
github.com/pingcap/tidb/types/parser_driver: module github.com/pingcap/tidb@latest found (v2.0.11+incompatible), but does not contain package github.com/pingcap/tidb/types/parser_driver

@atercattus
Copy link
Member

Hello.
Fixed at #559

@atercattus atercattus linked a pull request Apr 8, 2021 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants