x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd: GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4

[GoVulnBot]

In GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4, there is a vulnerability in the following Go packages or modules:

Unit	Fixed	Vulnerable Ranges
github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd	1.4.3	>= 1.4.0, < 1.4.3

Cross references:

• CVE-2020-15257 appears in issue x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd: GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4 #784 NOT_IMPORTABLE
• GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4 appears in issue x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd: GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4 #784 NOT_IMPORTABLE

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

modules:
  - module: TODO
    versions:
      - introduced: 1.4.0
        fixed: 1.4.3
    packages:
      - package: github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd
  - module: TODO
    versions:
      - introduced: 1.3.0
        fixed: 1.3.9
    packages:
      - package: github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd
  - module: TODO
    versions:
      - fixed: 1.2.0
    packages:
      - package: github.com/containerd/containerd/cmd
  - module: TODO
    versions:
      - introduced: 1.4.0
        fixed: 1.4.3
    packages:
      - package: github.com/containerd/containerd
  - module: TODO
    versions:
      - fixed: 1.3.9
    packages:
      - package: github.com/containerd/containerd
description: |-
    ## Impact

    Access controls for the shim’s API socket verified that the connecting process had an effective UID of 0, but did not otherwise restrict access to the abstract Unix domain socket. This would allow malicious containers running in the same network namespace as the shim, with an effective UID of 0 but otherwise reduced privileges, to cause new processes to be run with elevated privileges.

    ## Patches

    This vulnerability has been fixed in containerd 1.3.9 and 1.4.3.  Users should update to these versions as soon as they are released.  It should be noted that containers started with an old version of containerd-shim should be stopped and restarted, as running containers will continue to be vulnerable even after an upgrade.

    ## Workarounds

    If you are not providing the ability for untrusted users to start containers in the same network namespace as the shim (typically the "host" network namespace, for example with `docker run --net=host` or `hostNetwork: true` in a Kubernetes pod) and run with an effective UID of 0, you are not vulnerable to this issue.

    If you are running containers with a vulnerable configuration, you can deny access to all abstract sockets with AppArmor by adding a line similar to `deny unix addr=@**,` to your policy.

    It is best practice to run containers with a reduced set of privileges, with a non-zero UID, and with isolated namespaces.  The containerd maintainers strongly advise against sharing namespaces with the host. Reducing the set of isolation mechanisms used for a container necessarily increases that container's privilege, regardless of what container runtime is used for running that container.

    ## Credits

    The containerd maintainers would like to thank Jeff Dileo of NCC Group for responsibly disclosing this issue in accordance with the [containerd security policy](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/master/SECURITY.md) and for reviewing the patch.

    ## For more information

    If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:


    * [Open an issue](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/new/choose)
    * Email us at [email protected] if you think you’ve found a security bug.
cves:
  - CVE-2020-15257
ghsas:
  - GHSA-36xw-fx78-c5r4

[tatianab]

Duplicate of #784