-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/envoyproxy/envoy: CVE-2020-8664 #2311
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE
(DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process
Comments
Change https://go.dev/cl/540721 mentions this issue: |
This was referenced Feb 10, 2024
This was referenced Apr 10, 2024
This was referenced Jun 7, 2024
This was referenced Sep 20, 2024
This was referenced Dec 18, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
excluded: LEGACY_FALSE_POSITIVE
(DO NOT USE) Vulnerability marked as false positive before we introduced the triage process
CVE-2020-8664 references github.com/envoyproxy/envoy, which may be a Go module.
Description:
CNCF Envoy through 1.13.0 has incorrect Access Control when using SDS with Combined Validation Context. Using the same secret (e.g. trusted CA) across many resources together with the combined validation context could lead to the “static” part of the validation context to be not applied, even though it was visible in the active config dump.
References:
Cross references:
See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: