Skip to content

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/cubefs/cubefs: CVE-2023-46739 #2435

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Jan 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

CVE-2023-46739 references github.com/cubefs/cubefs, which may be a Go module.

Description:
CubeFS is an open-source cloud-native file storage system. A vulnerability was found during in the CubeFS master component in versions prior to 3.3.1 that could allow an untrusted attacker to steal user passwords by carrying out a timing attack. The root case of the vulnerability was that CubeFS used raw string comparison of passwords. The vulnerable part of CubeFS was the UserService of the master component. The UserService gets instantiated when starting the server of the master component. The issue has been patched in v3.3.1. For impacted users, there is no other way to mitigate the issue besides upgrading.

References:

Cross references:

See doc/triage.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

id: GO-ID-PENDING
modules:
    - module: github.com/cubefs/cubefs
      vulnerable_at: 2.5.2+incompatible
      packages:
        - package: cubefs
cves:
    - CVE-2023-46739
references:
    - advisory: https://github.com/cubefs/cubefs/security/advisories/GHSA-8579-7p32-f398
    - fix: https://github.com/cubefs/cubefs/commit/6a0d5fa45a77ff20c752fa9e44738bf5d86c84bd

@tatianab tatianab self-assigned this Jan 4, 2024
@tatianab
Copy link
Contributor

tatianab commented Jan 4, 2024

Duplicate of #2432

@tatianab tatianab marked this as a duplicate of #2432 Jan 4, 2024
@tatianab tatianab closed this as completed Jan 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants