Skip to content

x/vulndb: potential Go vuln in github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd: GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf #3319

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
GoVulnBot opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@GoVulnBot
Copy link

Advisory GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf references a vulnerability in the following Go modules:

Module
github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd

Description:

CWA-2024-009

Severity

Low (Marginal + Likely)[^1]

Affected versions:

  • wasmd < 0.53.1

Patched versions:

  • wasmd 0.53.2 (please note that wasmd 0.53.1 is broken and must not be used)

Description of the bug

(Blank for now. We'll add more detail once chains had a chance to upgrade.)

Mitigations

Apart from upgrading, it is recommended to not open the gRPC and REST APIs of validator nodes to the public internet. Use isolated and resource-constrained environments for running separate public RPC nodes instead.
These can then easily be thrown away and replaced with ...

References:

Cross references:

See doc/quickstart.md for instructions on how to triage this report.

id: GO-ID-PENDING
modules:
    - module: github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd
      versions:
        - fixed: 0.53.2
      vulnerable_at: 0.53.1
summary: Simulation of Wasmd message can cause crashing in github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd
ghsas:
    - GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf
references:
    - advisory: https://github.com/CosmWasm/wasmd/security/advisories/GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf
    - advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf
source:
    id: GHSA-vmg2-r3xv-r3xf
    created: 2024-12-10T17:01:24.797031485Z
review_status: UNREVIEWED

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Change https://go.dev/cl/634920 mentions this issue: data/reports: add 2 unreviewed reports

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants