You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Clearly [1, 2, 3] is not a string and this should probably be rejected. This kind of coercion makes sense for output types, but for mutation input this seems very odd, even more so considering that other things are validated (non-nullness, integers). I mean, if [1, 2, 3] is a string, then why isn't "foo" a valid integer? I am seeing a disparity here. Is there a reason for that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
this
is a correct payload for the muation
happening beacuse of this.
Clearly
[1, 2, 3]
is not a string and this should probably be rejected. This kind of coercion makes sense for output types, but for mutation input this seems very odd, even more so considering that other things are validated (non-nullness, integers). I mean, if[1, 2, 3]
is a string, then why isn't"foo"
a valid integer? I am seeing a disparity here. Is there a reason for that?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: