|
1 | 1 | ---
|
2 | 2 | title: Named Entity Recognition
|
3 |
| -description: A guide in my new Starlight docs site. |
| 3 | +description: A concise guide to Named Entity Recognition methods, applications, and challenges. |
4 | 4 | ---
|
5 | 5 |
|
6 |
| -Guides lead a user through a specific task they want to accomplish, often with a sequence of steps. |
7 |
| -Writing a good guide requires thinking about what your users are trying to do. |
| 6 | +Named Entity Recognition (NER) is the process of automatically identifying and categorizing key elements in text such as names of people, organizations, locations, and more. |
| 7 | +It is a foundational technique in natural language processing (NLP) that facilitates a range of applications including information extraction, content classification, and search optimization. |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +## Traditional NER Methods |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +Early NER systems relied on rule-based and statistical approaches. |
| 12 | +Tools like [SpaCy](https://spacy.io/) implement a combination of hand-crafted rules and machine learning algorithms to efficiently recognize entities in text. |
| 13 | +However, traditional NER models are typically effective only for a set of predefined entity types, limiting their flexibility. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +### GliNER: A Compact, Flexible Alternative |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +In contrast to conventional systems, GliNER introduces a compact NER model designed to identify any type of entity. |
| 18 | +Leveraging a bidirectional transformer encoder, GliNER facilitates parallel entity extraction—an advantage over the slow sequential token generation characteristic of many large language models (LLMs). |
| 19 | +Comprehensive testing shows that GliNER outperforms both ChatGPT and fine-tuned LLMs in zero-shot evaluations on various NER benchmarks, addressing limitations in traditional models while maintaining resource efficiency. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +## NER with Large Language Models |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +Modern large language models (LLMs) have introduced a paradigm shift in how NER tasks can be approached. |
| 24 | +LLMs can perform NER in a zero-shot or few-shot learning setting, extracting arbitrary entities through natural language instructions. |
| 25 | +This offers greater flexibility compared to traditional methods, although the size and cost of LLMs can be impractical in resource-limited scenarios. |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +## Entity Linking and Entity Disambiguation |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +Beyond merely identifying entities, many applications require associating them with specific, unique identifiers—a process known as entity linking. |
| 30 | +This often involves resolving ambiguities where the same name might refer to multiple real-world entities, a challenge known as entity disambiguation. |
| 31 | +High-level solutions typically integrate NER with external knowledge bases and context-aware algorithms to ensure that each recognized entity is accurately matched to its correct reference. |
8 | 32 |
|
9 | 33 | ## Further reading
|
10 | 34 |
|
11 |
| -- Read [about how-to guides](https://diataxis.fr/how-to-guides/) in the Diátaxis framework |
| 35 | +- [GliNER paper](https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08526) |
| 36 | +- [SpaCy](https://spacy.io/) |
0 commit comments