[SYCL][Test E2E] Change 'CHECK-NEXT' to 'CHECK' of abort_internalization.cpp (#9834)

To make the test more robust with ZE_DEBUG environment.

Author: myler

sycl/test-e2e/KernelFusion/abort_internalization.cpp

@@ -114,57 +114,57 @@ int main() {
   std::cout << "None, Local(0)\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::None, 0, Internalization::Local, 0);
   // CHECK: None, Local(0)
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   // Scenario: One accessor without internalization, one with private
   // internalization. Should fall back to no internalization and print a
   // warning.
   std::cout << "None, Private\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::None, 0, Internalization::Private, 0);
-  // CHECK-NEXT: None, Private
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Not performing specified private promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: None, Private
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Not performing specified private promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   // Scenario: Both accessor with local promotion, but the second kernel does
   // not specify a work-group size. No promotion should happen and a warning
   // should be printed.
   std::cout << "Local(8), Local(0)\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::Local, 8, Internalization::Local, 0);
-  // CHECK-NEXT: Local(8), Local(0)
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Work-group size for local promotion not specified, not performing internalization
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: Local(8), Local(0)
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Work-group size for local promotion not specified, not performing internalization
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   // Scenario: Both accessor with local promotion, but the first kernel does
   // not specify a work-group size. No promotion should happen and a warning
   // should be printed.
   std::cout << "Local(0), Local(8)\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::Local, 0, Internalization::Local, 8);
-  // CHECK-NEXT: Local(0), Local(8)
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Work-group size for local promotion not specified, not performing internalization
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: Local(0), Local(8)
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Work-group size for local promotion not specified, not performing internalization
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion, due to previous mismatch or because previous accessor specified no promotion
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   // Scenario: Both accessor with local promotion, but the kernels specify
   // different work-group sizes. No promotion should happen and a warning should
   // be printed.
   std::cout << "Local(8), Local(16)\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::Local, 8, Internalization::Local, 16);
-  // CHECK-NEXT: Local(8), Local(16)
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion due to work-group size mismatch
-  // CHECK-NEXT: ERROR: JIT compilation for kernel fusion failed with message:
-  // CHECK-NEXT: Cannot fuse kernels with different offsets or local sizes
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: Local(8), Local(16)
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Not performing specified local promotion due to work-group size mismatch
+  // CHECK: ERROR: JIT compilation for kernel fusion failed with message:
+  // CHECK: Cannot fuse kernels with different offsets or local sizes
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   // Scenario: One accessor with local internalization, one with private
   // internalization. Should fall back to local internalization and print a
   // warning.
   std::cout << "Local(8), Private(8)\n";
   performFusion(q, Internalization::Local, 8, Internalization::Private, 8,
                 /* expectInternalization */ true);
-  // CHECK-NEXT: Local(8), Private(8)
-  // CHECK-NEXT: WARNING: Performing local internalization instead, because previous accessor specified local promotion
-  // CHECK-NEXT: COMPUTATION OK
+  // CHECK: Local(8), Private(8)
+  // CHECK: WARNING: Performing local internalization instead, because previous accessor specified local promotion
+  // CHECK: COMPUTATION OK
 
   return 0;
 }