Skip to content

Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT usage for Release builds #11555

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
help wanted We don't have ability to look into this at the moment, but contributions are welcome

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. E.g. PGO results for LLVM-related tooling are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (as shown for Clang in its documentation). That's why I think trying to optimize the DPC compiler with PGO can be a good idea.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on the DPC compiler. And if it shows improvements - add a note about possible improvements in DPC's compiler performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the DPC tooling according to their own workloads.
  • Optimize published pre-built binaries

Maybe testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too since the compilers like Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO (Clang even already supports required build configurations).

If you already optimize the DPC binaries with PGO and/or BOLT, could you please share your performance optimization numbers (before and after applying PGO/BOLT)?

Thanks in advance!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Mar 26, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Apr 25, 2025
@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov reopened this Apr 25, 2025
@intel intel deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 25, 2025
@intel intel deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 25, 2025
@intel intel deleted a comment from github-actions bot Apr 25, 2025
@AlexeySachkov AlexeySachkov added the help wanted We don't have ability to look into this at the moment, but contributions are welcome label Apr 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted We don't have ability to look into this at the moment, but contributions are welcome
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants