Skip to content

workbench: drop cabalWrapped #4873

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2023
Merged

workbench: drop cabalWrapped #4873

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 9, 2023

Conversation

deepfire
Copy link
Contributor

@deepfire deepfire commented Feb 9, 2023

The end of an era -- the workbench will no longer insist on following the Nix-supplied package DB only -- we're dropping the use of cabalWrapped.

@deepfire deepfire requested review from a team, mgmeier and fmaste as code owners February 9, 2023 07:51
@deepfire deepfire merged commit b22aae8 into master Feb 9, 2023
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the wb-drop-cabalWrapped branch February 9, 2023 07:52
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ let
]
++ lib.optionals ( useCabalRun)
(with haskellPackages; [
cabalWrapped
cabal-install
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should now also drop the explicit packages argument in the haskell.nix shell function.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, yes, right, forgot about that one.

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants