F.16 ("in" parameters): Remove Matrix example and notes on assignment

The `Matrix` example and the notes about assignment appear off-topic here, as rule F.16 is specifically about "in" parameters.

Author: N-Dekker

CppCoreGuidelines.md

@@ -2927,31 +2927,11 @@ For advanced uses (only), where you really need to optimize for rvalues passed t
 
     void sink(unique_ptr<widget>);  // input only, and moves ownership of the widget
 
-Avoid "esoteric techniques" such as:
-
-* Passing arguments as `T&&` "for efficiency".
-  Most rumors about performance advantages from passing by `&&` are false or brittle (but see [F.18](#Rf-consume) and [F.19](#Rf-forward)).
-* Returning `const T&` from assignments and similar operations (see [F.47](#Rf-assignment-op).)
-
-##### Example
-
-Assuming that `Matrix` has move operations (possibly by keeping its elements in a `std::vector`):
-
-    Matrix operator+(const Matrix& a, const Matrix& b)
-    {
-        Matrix res;
-        // ... fill res with the sum ...
-        return res;
-    }
-
-    Matrix x = m1 + m2;  // move constructor
-
-    y = m3 + m3;         // move assignment
+Avoid "esoteric techniques" such as passing arguments as `T&&` "for efficiency".
+Most rumors about performance advantages from passing by `&&` are false or brittle (but see [F.18](#Rf-consume) and [F.19](#Rf-forward)).
 
 ##### Notes
 
-The return value optimization doesn't handle the assignment case, but the move assignment does.
-
 A reference can be assumed to refer to a valid object (language rule).
 There is no (legitimate) "null reference."
 If you need the notion of an optional value, use a pointer, `std::optional`, or a special value used to denote "no value."