You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[Dexter] Adapt to upcoming lldb stepping behavior (llvm#108127)
lldb will change how it reports stop reasons around breakpoints in the
near future. I landed an earlier version of this change and noticed
debuginfo test failures on the CI bots due to the changes. I'm
addressing the issues found by CI at
llvm#105594 and will re-land once
I've done all of them.
Currently, when lldb stops at a breakpoint instruction -- but has not
yet executed the instruction -- it will overwrite the thread's Stop
Reason with "breakpoint-hit". This caused bugs when the original stop
reason was important to the user - for instance, a watchpoint on an
AArch64 system where we have to instruction-step past the watchpoint to
find the new value. Normally we would instruction step, fetch the new
value, then report the user that a watchpoint has been hit with the old
and new values. But if the instruction after this access is a breakpoint
site, we overwrite the "watchpoint hit" stop reason (and related
actions) with "breakpoint hit".
dexter sets breakpoints on all source lines, then steps line-to-line,
hitting the breakpoints. But with this new behavior, we see two steps
per source line: The first step gets us to the start of the next line,
with a "step completed" stop reason. Then we step again and we execute
the breakpoint instruction, stop with the pc the same, and report
"breakpoint hit". Now we can step a second time and move past the
breakpoint.
I've changed the `step` method in LLDB.py to check if we step to a
breakpoint site but have a "step completed" stop reason -- in which case
we have this new breakpoint behavior, and we need to step a second time
to actually hit the breakpoint like the debuginfo tests expect.
0 commit comments