We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The LICENSE file does state SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1 the pom does use LGPL-2.1-or-later.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1
LGPL-2.1-or-later
As the text in the LICENSE file does point to LGPL-2.1-or-later too, i guess it should be SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later.
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
i guess it should be SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later.
I concur. Ref: https://spdx.org/licenses/ and https://spdx.dev/learn/handling-license-info/
Can you submit a PR please?
Sorry, something went wrong.
1465253
i guess i am too late, sorry. and thanks for taking care!
@joerg1985 no problem. I had the project open and so just did it. Thanks for noticing the difference.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
The LICENSE file does state
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1
the pom does useLGPL-2.1-or-later
.As the text in the LICENSE file does point to
LGPL-2.1-or-later
too, i guess it should beSPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-or-later
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: