Open Community Working Meeting 2023-09-25 - 14:00 PT

[benjagm]

Open Community Working Meeting 2023-09-25 - 14:00 PT

📺 See Recording

⏪ Go To Previous Meeting

Agenda:

Topic	Owner	Decision/NextStep
Review last call's action items	[facilitator]
#408 - Identify a list of critical interfaces that implementations should have and empower implementers with better resources	@Relequestual	Waiting for additional comments from @Julian
We should all agree what constitutes an "implementation" json-schema-org/json-schema-spec#1440	@jdesrosiers	The definition of implementation won't be added to the spec, instead it will be added to the glossary.
Check on the progress of the stable release development	@benjagm	There are PR awaiting review.
New website roll-out plan - #53	@benjagm

Action items:

• @Julian to provide update on the progress of Identify a list of critical interfaces that implementations should have and empower implementers with better resources #408.
• @benjagm to add a question in the implementer's survey regarding the definition of Implementation.

Notes:

• The team continued the discussion Discuss a recent blog proposal (PR 40) #483 on the blog post proposal and the related academic paper. They acknowledged the need to address the issues in the paper, even though the conversation tone is not ideal.
• @benjagm will reply asking for clarification of the intent and benefits for Jason schema Community.
• The team discussed Identify a list of critical interfaces that implementations should have and empower implementers with better resources #408 but to continue the discussion they will wait unit @Julian updates on the progress.
• The teal discusses what constitutes an implementation #1440. They agreed on the difficulty of defining what constitutes an implementation and where to draw the line between implementation and tooling. The team agreed on including a question about the definition in the upcoming survey for implementers.
• @gregsdennis shared the progress of the stable release development and mentioned that some PRs were waiting for @karenetheridge comments.
• The team talked about the distinction between the core spec and core vocabulary, and the need for a discussion on whether applicators should be included in the core.
• @benjagm discussed the readiness of the website and his plan to ensure all updates are included before launching it next Monday. He also requested assistance from @Relequestual to make necessary changes during the switch from the old site to the new one.

Agenda Items rolling over:

• list

Attendees

Account
@gregsdennis
@Relequestual
@benjagm
@jdesrosiers