Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

Install with juliaup? #19

Closed
sjkelly opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Install with juliaup? #19

sjkelly opened this issue Apr 18, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@sjkelly
Copy link

sjkelly commented Apr 18, 2023

This container is really helpful to get up and running with codespaces quite easily. However, often times I am interested in testing on several Julia versions in the container. I am wondering if it makes sense to use juliaup to manager the installs, making it easy for a user to add a new Julia version once they are in the devcontainer.

@eitsupi
Copy link
Contributor

eitsupi commented Apr 18, 2023

@sjkelly Use the Dev Container Feature instead of this repo.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/devcontainer-features

@gerlero
Copy link

gerlero commented Jun 26, 2023

@sjkelly Use the Dev Container Feature instead of this repo.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/devcontainer-features

@eitsupi thanks for the work on these projects. I see a substantial overlap between the target use cases and developers of that project and this one. Do you have a recommendation on whether some generic Julia project should prefer using this container image vs. a standard devcontainer with that feature added to it?

@eitsupi
Copy link
Contributor

eitsupi commented Jun 26, 2023

@gerlero I believe that this repository is outdated and that there is essentially no advantage to continuing to use.
See microsoft/vscode-dev-containers#1114 (comment).

Since Julia is very lightweight and can be installed in seconds, it is very easy to install any Julia using the julia Feature on a base image of your choice.

However, for now the Julia Feature lacks postCreateCommand (JuliaLang/devcontainer-features#9).
If you would like to use this, a PR to add this would be an excellent contribution.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants