You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I can see the reasoning behind the current behavior to some extent - the "finally" callback executes when all of the jobs in the batch have fun exactly once (success or failure - doesn't matter)... in the case of your chain, the jobs after the failing job have not executed at all, so finally is never firing. It isn't firing because "pending jobs" - "failed jobs" does not equal 0.
This is because when you add a chain to a batch we increment pending jobs for the number of jobs in the chain.
Description:
Hi, if i distpach a simple chained batch like this : chains-within-batches
If any of thes chained job fail, the closure defined doesn't trigger, it's a bug?
Steps To Reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: