Skip to content

Commit 59620ef

Browse files
committedApr 14, 2020
fix: Small updates to goals and open questions.
1 parent 9f3c1c8 commit 59620ef

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-0
lines changed
 

Diff for: ‎rfcs/rfc-ember-integration-v2.md

+2
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ This project will be successful if it meets the following criteria:
3333
* Works well with addons that are using `yarn link` to develop in tandem with an application.
3434
* Unblock the planned "Block Passing" capability.
3535
* Both lazy and eager engines are working.
36+
* Ember integration v1 remains functional and releasable from the trunk branch.
3637

3738
# Summary of Architectural Changes
3839

@@ -513,6 +514,7 @@ It should be noted that when the optimizer is disabled the CSS Blocks integratio
513514
## Open Questions
514515

515516
1. If a block inherits from a block and adds a substate to an existing state, should that state be reachable from a template that only holds a reference to the to the base block? It seems possible that the new substate value could be passed as an argument to the component thereby allowing the new substate to be selected. This proposed rewrite strategy prevents this from happening, but we could move substate selection to the rewrite helper, and that would make it possible for the new substate to be reachable. But... is it a good idea to allow it?
517+
2. Does v2 need to interoperate with v1?
516518

517519
## How do we teach this?
518520

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
Please sign in to comment.