Skip to content

Support older linux kernel in glibc #55

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
cooperq opened this issue Apr 9, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #56
Open

Support older linux kernel in glibc #55

cooperq opened this issue Apr 9, 2025 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #56

Comments

@cooperq
Copy link

cooperq commented Apr 9, 2025

Right now your toolchain is set to compile only for linux kernel 5.10 or later. It would be good to pick an older kernel, perhaps 3.2, as your compile target for those of us who are trying to compile for older targets, such as embedded arm systems. I am specifically requesting this for the arm7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf if it makes a difference. Happy to provide a PR for this.

@messense
Copy link
Owner

See also #39, there are conflict requirments. But it's probably ok to lower it for armv7. PR welcome.

@cooperq
Copy link
Author

cooperq commented Apr 10, 2025

actually since this is just for use on my project which supports strange old hardware https://github.com/efforg/rayhunter I think it's probably not worth making a PR which will potentially break other people's projects, probably just better for me to fork the code. Thanks!

@cooperq cooperq closed this as completed Apr 10, 2025
@cooperq cooperq linked a pull request Apr 10, 2025 that will close this issue
@cooperq cooperq reopened this Apr 10, 2025
@cooperq
Copy link
Author

cooperq commented Apr 10, 2025

Reopening because the build job failed on my fork so maybe its best to just do it here instead 😩 I have opened a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants