I got the same error.

This is the only example I've seen of using python to manage multiple mcp servers (and it doesn't seem to work). Are there others?

having the same issue.

immediately after receiving an OK response from the LLM, get this error.

EDIT: from Claude: The key problem is a violation of a fundamental principle in asynchronous programming. In async frameworks (like Python's asyncio, trio, or curio), a "cancel scope" is a context that manages cancellation of operations. This error indicates the code is trying to exit a cancel scope from a different task than the one where it was created.

I may have a solution but I won't be able to test it until about 6 hours time as i have to go out.

Fingers crossed. but the solution is from Claude. It's already sent me on a number of wild goose chases w/r/t this exact issue. but i have a better understanding of it now so i should be able to better analyze the proposed fix line by line once i attempt to implement it.

I'll keep you posted

I met the same problem, how did you solve it?

having the same issue.

immediately after receiving an OK response from the LLM, get this error.

EDIT: from Claude: The key problem is a violation of a fundamental principle in asynchronous programming. In async frameworks (like Python's asyncio, trio, or curio), a "cancel scope" is a context that manages cancellation of operations. This error indicates the code is trying to exit a cancel scope from a different task than the one where it was created.

I may have a solution but I won't be able to test it until about 6 hours time as i have to go out.

Fingers crossed. but the solution is from Claude. It's already sent me on a number of wild goose chases w/r/t this exact issue. but i have a better understanding of it now so i should be able to better analyze the proposed fix line by line once i attempt to implement it.

I'll keep you posted

Many 6 hours have passed now, are you back?

asyncio.gather() cannot be used since the order of initialization is unknown. we need to know this initialization order since we need to close the servers in reverse initialization order. let me know if there is a way to launch the servers in parallel, since this is a big bottleneck seemingly.