Skip to content

Wireless absent in lsmodels() #8078

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
VitMain opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

Wireless absent in lsmodels() #8078

VitMain opened this issue Dec 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application

Comments

@VitMain
Copy link

VitMain commented Dec 15, 2021

NetBox version

v3.1.1

Python version

3.8

Steps to Reproduce

  1. python3 manage.py nbshell
  2. lsmodels()

Expected Behavior

Something with wireless

Observed Behavior

Circuits:
CircuitType
Circuit
CircuitTermination
Provider
ProviderNetwork
DCIM:
ConsolePort
ConsoleServerPort
PowerPort
PowerOutlet
Interface
FrontPort
RearPort
DeviceBay
InventoryItem
Manufacturer
DeviceType
DeviceRole
Platform
Device
VirtualChassis
Cable
CablePath
ConsolePortTemplate
ConsoleServerPortTemplate
PowerPortTemplate
PowerOutletTemplate
InterfaceTemplate
FrontPortTemplate
RearPortTemplate
DeviceBayTemplate
PowerPanel
PowerFeed
RackRole
Rack
RackReservation
Region
SiteGroup
Site
Location
Extras:
ObjectChange
Tag
TaggedItem
ConfigContext
CustomField
Webhook
CustomLink
ExportTemplate
ImageAttachment
JournalEntry
JobResult
ConfigRevision
Script
Report
IPAM:
FHRPGroup
FHRPGroupAssignment
RIR
ASN
Aggregate
Role
Prefix
IPRange
IPAddress
Service
VLANGroup
VLAN
VRF
RouteTarget
Tenancy:
ContactGroup
ContactRole
Contact
ContactAssignment
TenantGroup
Tenant
Users:
AdminGroup
AdminUser
UserConfig
Token
ObjectPermission
Virtualization:
ClusterType
ClusterGroup
Cluster
VirtualMachine
VMInterface

@VitMain VitMain added the type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application label Dec 15, 2021
@jeremystretch jeremystretch added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Dec 15, 2021
@jeremystretch jeremystretch self-assigned this Dec 15, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 16, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants