Skip to content

feat!: remove generic hook, add specific type hooks #766

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

feat!: remove generic hook, add specific type hooks #766

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

toddbaert
Copy link
Member

This PR brings the react SDK's evaluation API in-line with other SDKS. It does this by:

  • adding flag value hooks for each type (these all use common code, with only differing generic args)
  • adding flag details hooks for each type (again using common code)
  • adding optional generic constraints for each

I think this is important before a non-experimental release for 2 reasons:

  • it's consistent with our other JS components and other SDKs
  • it fixes a potential bug if uses accidentally pass the wrong default type

⚠️ This is a breaking change.

@toddbaert toddbaert requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2024 14:49
@toddbaert
fixup: lint
3a24713 
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
@toddbaert toddbaert requested review from luizbon, beeme1mr, lukas-reining, Kavindu-Dodan and luizgribeiro and removed request for luizbon January 16, 2024 14:52
beeme1mr
beeme1mr reviewed Jan 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@beeme1mr beeme1mr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

value should always be present on the EvaluationDetails.

toddbaert and others added 4 commits January 16, 2024 15:54
@toddbaert @beeme1mr
Update packages/react/src/use-feature-flag.ts
3c7e27d 
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
@toddbaert @beeme1mr
Update packages/react/src/use-feature-flag.ts
0664abf 
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
@toddbaert @beeme1mr
Update packages/react/src/use-feature-flag.ts
a1bbfd4 
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
@toddbaert @beeme1mr
Update packages/react/src/use-feature-flag.ts
c8606fe 
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
@toddbaert toddbaert requested a review from beeme1mr January 16, 2024 20:55
luizgribeiro
luizgribeiro approved these changes Jan 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@luizgribeiro luizgribeiro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The newer API made a lot o sense IMO.

LGTM!

@luizgribeiro
Copy link
Contributor

So, from what we've been exploring in the Nest SDK I think there might be a nicer way to deal with multiple providers at the same time. It's totally out of scope for this PR, but I wanted to write it down since it's the first time that I look at the React SDK.
I don't know if it is reasonable now, but could OF use one Context to store all providers resolutions and flag evaluation hooks provide the desired provider name through options?

lukas-reining
lukas-reining approved these changes Jan 18, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@lukas-reining lukas-reining left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the change and that it makes all SDKs and components be more consistent!

@toddbaert toddbaert added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 18, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit d1d02fa Jan 18, 2024
@toddbaert toddbaert deleted the feat/react-sdk-consistency branch January 18, 2024 16:46
@openfeaturebot openfeaturebot mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024
Merged
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2024
@openfeaturebot @toddbaert
chore(main): release react-sdk 0.1.0-experimental (#764)
a9e48aa 
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.1.0-experimental](react-sdk-v0.0.6-experimental...react-sdk-v0.1.0-experimental)
(2024-01-18)


### ⚠ BREAKING CHANGES

* remove generic hook, add specific type hooks
([#766](#766))

### ✨ New Features

* remove generic hook, add specific type hooks
([#766](#766))
([d1d02fa](d1d02fa))


### 🧹 Chore

* fix react-sdk REAMDE example, add missing `EvaluationContext`
([#762](#762))
([1e13333](1e13333))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Signed-off-by: OpenFeature Bot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Todd Baert <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@luizgribeiro luizgribeiro luizgribeiro approved these changes

@lukas-reining lukas-reining lukas-reining approved these changes

@Kavindu-Dodan Kavindu-Dodan Awaiting requested review from Kavindu-Dodan

@beeme1mr beeme1mr Awaiting requested review from beeme1mr

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@toddbaert @luizgribeiro @beeme1mr @lukas-reining