Skip to content

chore: add codeowner file to be consistent with the rest of openfeature #477

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025

Conversation

aepfli
Copy link
Member

@aepfli aepfli commented Apr 5, 2025

All the other sdks use codeowner files to ensure proper approvals, we should also utilize this within python-sdk

All the other sdks use codeowner files to ensure proper approvals, we should also utilize this within python-sdk

Signed-off-by: Simon Schrottner <[email protected]>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.85%. Comparing base (1ae9fc2) to head (92086b4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #477   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.85%   97.85%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        1723     1723           
=======================================
  Hits         1686     1686           
  Misses         37       37           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.85% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gruebel gruebel merged commit 7a30ef9 into main Apr 7, 2025
14 checks passed
@gruebel gruebel deleted the aepfli-patch-1 branch April 7, 2025 14:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants