Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[epic] Help admins determine necessary permissions for bundle lifecycling #919

Open
joelanford opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
epic v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0

Comments

@joelanford
Copy link
Member

joelanford commented Jun 11, 2024

After we implemented #737, users now provide their own service accounts that must have the permissions necessary to manage the lifecycle of a bundle.

This epics depends on #988 and #1424.

The service account needs CRUD on each group resource of each unique object in the bundle

There are some technical challenges here:

  1. The bundle must be pulled, extracted, and rendered in order to see what would be deployed.
  2. User input from [epic] ClusterExtension parameters passed through to templating engine #381 will cause the contents of the rendered manifest to be configurable, potentially resulting in a different set of RBAC required.
@joelanford joelanford added epic v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 labels Jun 11, 2024
@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty added v1.1 and removed v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 labels Nov 5, 2024
@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty added the v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0 label Dec 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
epic v1.x Issues related to OLMv1 features that come after 1.0
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants