-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 552
streamline upstream release process #2118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Related to #1812 |
Related to #2129 |
Some notes from our discussion:
Next step is to develop smaller stories and take incremental steps to improve the release process. |
Related to #2130 |
I think the spirit of this issue has largely been addressed by the goreleaser changes implemented, closing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Feature Request
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Example: "I have an issue when (...)"
The current release process defined in https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-lifecycle-manager/blob/master/doc/design/release.md is manual and error-prone. It would be better to have a more consistent release cycle with less manual steps involved.
Maybe using a workflow with goreleaser like in https://github.com/operator-framework/operator-sdk/blob/master/.github/workflows/deploy.yml could be the right step forward.
Describe the solution you'd like
We can cut more upstream releases faster and in a more automated way
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: