You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #4470, the test_fast_track_finite_arrays, but it raised concerns that the replacement of NaN or Infinity with null in arrays is no longer running because the array is base64 encoded already when that code is run. The code that does the replacement currently is here
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
archmoj
changed the title
Replacement of infinity and NaN with null might be skipped
Infinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON
Oct 17, 2024
archmoj
changed the title
Infinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSONInfinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON
Oct 17, 2024
archmoj
changed the title
Infinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSONInfinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON and base64 encoding should not be used in those cases
Oct 17, 2024
marthacryan
changed the title
Infinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON and base64 encoding should not be used in those casesInfinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON
Oct 17, 2024
The original behavior of converting infinity and Nan values was added because np.Inf and np.Nan couldn't be correctly stored in JSON objects, so these values were converted to null. It appears that base64 is correctly converting these values before sending them to plotly.js, so this is not an issue (as far as we know). Plotly.js may not handle Infinity or NaN values in all cases, but we did check this for scatter plots. Plotly.js ignores these values - this is the result that we expect.
archmoj
changed the title
Infinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSONInfinity and NaN should be converted to undefined in JSON? Or base64 could/should be used to describe these values in the figure?
Oct 17, 2024
Oh this is cool, b64 can actually encode more info than regular JSON. I think this is fine behavior, but most of the time the behavior will (ie should, and we should add some tests) be indistinguishable from null. Meaning if infinity or nan values are in coordinates they should not be displayed, nor should they impact autorange. I suppose in principle a bar chart could show a bar to infinity (without impacting range) but I wouldn’t implement that without a clear use case. Otherwise about the only cases I can see this having a concrete effect are colorscale (+/-inf should show the color at the corresponding end of the scale, as any other out-of-range value would) or hover (via customdata or other non-coordinate fields in the hovertemplate)
I can't see any reason to not take advantage of this except possibly the extra work it would take to handle the cases @alexcjohnson outlines (e.g., making sure inf hits the margin of the color scale), so I'm 👍 to having Infinity and NaN rather than forcing conversion to undefined.
In #4470, the
test_fast_track_finite_arrays
, but it raised concerns that the replacement of NaN or Infinity with null in arrays is no longer running because the array is base64 encoded already when that code is run. The code that does the replacement currently is hereThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: