-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
No information on the README about the future of this package #18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
It is on PyPI, and will remain so. It's also used by pip for its PEP 517 implementation, so it's not going away. However, your point about documentation is fair. The project doesn't really have a full-time maintainer at the moment. @takluyver provided the initial implementation, and I contributed a number of fixes in the process of using it in pip. But neither of us want to take on too much commitment to ongoing management of this project. So one of the key things for sustainability will be to get a good community around the project. That means basically interested people using the code and contributing PRs and enhancements. To be specific, the code in wrappers.py and the code supporting that is critical to pip, so that will be well-supported (pip will provide plenty of real-world use of that code!). But the other code (in particular Hopefully, that gives a fair summary of the current state of the project. I don't know how much of that should go in the docs (some of it is too transitory) but I'll see what I can do. |
To give a brief update: the |
I've clarified this in the README. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This package looks very interesting, and I'd love to make use of it in a real non-testing project.
However, it is quite unclear if after the testing period 1. this will vanish entirely, 2. be available with the same name on pypi, 3. be available with a different name/part of something else on pypi, ...
Can you add some information to the README clarifying where this project is heading, and how much sense it makes to use this for more than just playing around at this stage?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: