Skip to content

Build/check should fallback to setuptools unconditionally #49

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jaraco opened this issue May 24, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #151
Closed

Build/check should fallback to setuptools unconditionally #49

jaraco opened this issue May 24, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #151

Comments

@jaraco
Copy link
Member

jaraco commented May 24, 2019

In this comment, @gaborbernat suggests that the project should unconditionally fallback to setuptools if PEP 517 is not indicated.

That seems like a plausible suggestion, but I'd like to separate that concern from the concern in the PR.

@takluyver
Copy link
Member

I've closed most of the issues relating to the build and check layer, but I'm still open to the simple change to make them fallback to setuptools, if people want to implement that. There's already a compat_system function implementing such a fallback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants