You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
venv/lib doesn't exist. It should be ./venv/lib or better yet ./lib (which is what it used to be). I don't quite understand how ./lib causes #300. I always thought that the the . made the path relative to the link and not the current working directory.
It merge request also seems to fix #334 which appears to be an issue creating a virtualenv from within a virtualenv. Is that supported and/or wise?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#334 is not about creating a virtualenv from within a virtualenv, it's about re-running virtualenv on top of an existing virtualenv, which is supported.
And I'm not sure about #330 either, I didn't have access to a setup to reproduce it but I took the word of the reporter.
Presuming the report was accurate and the problem was caused by the use of a literal '.' in the symlink, it should be fixable by creating an even simpler same-directory symlink whose content is just "lib" (not "./lib" or "/full/path/to/venv/lib"). This is also better in case people are using --relocatable. I'm about to push that solution, please let me know if it solves your problem.
Merge request #335 seems to have broken virtualenv in my environment. I end up with this directory structure:
venv/lib doesn't exist. It should be ./venv/lib or better yet ./lib (which is what it used to be). I don't quite understand how ./lib causes #300. I always thought that the the . made the path relative to the link and not the current working directory.
It merge request also seems to fix #334 which appears to be an issue creating a virtualenv from within a virtualenv. Is that supported and/or wise?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: