You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
`urllib.unquote_to_bytes` and `urllib.unquote` could both potentially generate `O(len(string))` intermediate `bytes` or `str` objects while computing the unquoted final result depending on the input provided. As Python objects are relatively large, this could consume a lot of ram.
This switches the implementation to using an expanding `bytearray` and a generator internally instead of precomputed `split()` style operations.
Microbenchmarks with some antagonistic inputs like `mess = "\u0141%%%20a%fe"*1000` show this is 10-20% slower for unquote and unquote_to_bytes and no different for typical inputs that are short or lack much unicode or % escaping. But the functions are already quite fast anyways so not a big deal. The slowdown scales consistently linear with input size as expected.
Memory usage observed manually using `/usr/bin/time -v` on `python -m timeit` runs of larger inputs. Unittesting memory consumption is difficult and does not seem worthwhile.
Observed memory usage is ~1/2 for `unquote()` and <1/3 for `unquote_to_bytes()` using `python -m timeit -s 'from urllib.parse import unquote, unquote_to_bytes; v="\u0141%01\u0161%20"*500_000' 'unquote_to_bytes(v)'` as a test.
0 commit comments