@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ PEP Replacement
15
15
===============
16
16
17
17
This PEP has been superseded by the updated material in the Python Developer's
18
- Guide [1].
18
+ Guide [1]_ .
19
19
20
20
Introduction
21
21
============
@@ -34,10 +34,10 @@ equipped to detect and report gaps in the library; things that are missing but
34
34
should be added.
35
35
36
36
New functionality is commonly added to the library in the form of new modules.
37
- This PEP will describe the procedure for the _addition_ of new modules. PEP 4
38
- deals with procedures for deprecation of modules; the _removal_ of old and
37
+ This PEP will describe the procedure for the *addition* of new modules. PEP 4
38
+ deals with procedures for deprecation of modules; the *removal* of old and
39
39
unused modules from the standard library. Finally there is also the issue of
40
- _changing_ existing modules to make the picture of library evolution complete.
40
+ *changing* existing modules to make the picture of library evolution complete.
41
41
PEP 3 and PEP 5 give some guidelines on this. The continued maintenance of
42
42
existing modules is an integral part of the decision on whether to add a new
43
43
module to the standard library. Therefore, this PEP also introduces concepts
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ Maintainer(s)
65
65
All contributions to the standard library need one or more maintainers. This
66
66
can be an individual, but it is frequently a group of people such as the XML-
67
67
SIG. Groups may subdivide maintenance tasks among themselves. One ore more
68
- maintainers shall be the _head maintainer_ (usually this is also the main
68
+ maintainers shall be the *head maintainer* (usually this is also the main
69
69
developer). Head maintainers are convenient people the integrators can address
70
70
if they want to resolve specific issues, such as the ones detailed later in
71
71
this document.
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ document and a reference implementation. The library PEP differs from a normal
102
102
standard track PEP in that the reference implementation should in this case
103
103
always already have been written before the PEP is to be reviewed for inclusion
104
104
by the integrators and to be commented upon by the community; the reference
105
- implementation _is_ the proposed contribution.
105
+ implementation *is* the proposed contribution.
106
106
107
107
This different requirement exists for the following reasons:
108
108
@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ Relationship to the mythical Catalog?
184
184
References
185
185
==========
186
186
187
- [1] Adding to the Stdlib http://docs.python.org/devguide/stdlibchanges.html
187
+ .. [1] Adding to the Stdlib
188
+ (http://docs.python.org/devguide/stdlibchanges.html)
188
189
189
190
Copyright
190
191
=========
@@ -196,4 +197,4 @@ This document has been placed in the public domain.
196
197
mode: indented-text
197
198
indent-tabs-mode: nil
198
199
fill-column: 70
199
- End:
200
+ End:
0 commit comments