@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Python 2 ``str``) was as simple as::
128
128
129
129
>>> str(123)
130
130
'123'
131
-
131
+
132
132
With Python 3 that became the more verbose::
133
133
134
134
>>> b'%d' % 123
@@ -236,18 +236,12 @@ of this PEP.
236
236
References
237
237
==========
238
238
239
- .. [1] Initial March 2014 discussion thread on python-ideas
240
- (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027295.html)
241
- .. [2] Guido's initial feedback in that thread
242
- (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027376.html)
243
- .. [3] Issue proposing moving zero-initialised sequences to a dedicated API
244
- (http://bugs.python.org/issue20895)
245
- .. [4] Issue proposing to use calloc() for zero-initialised binary sequences
246
- (http://bugs.python.org/issue21644)
247
- .. [5] August 2014 discussion thread on python-dev
248
- (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027295.html)
249
- .. [6] June 2016 discussion thread on python-dev
250
- (https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144875.html)
239
+ * `Initial March 2014 discussion thread on python-ideas <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027295.html>`_
240
+ * `Guido's initial feedback in that thread <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027376.html>`_
241
+ * `Issue proposing moving zero-initialised sequences to a dedicated API <https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/65094>`_
242
+ * `Issue proposing to use calloc() for zero-initialised binary sequences <https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/65843>`_
243
+ * `August 2014 discussion thread on python-dev <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2014-March/027295.html>`_
244
+ * `June 2016 discussion thread on python-dev <https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/144875.html>`_
251
245
252
246
253
247
Copyright
0 commit comments