Skip to content

↔ [Converter] Add support for aten::__derive_index in Torch-TensorRT #834

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
p1x31 opened this issue Jan 29, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1259
Closed

↔ [Converter] Add support for aten::__derive_index in Torch-TensorRT #834

p1x31 opened this issue Jan 29, 2022 · 4 comments · Fixed by #1259
Assignees
Labels
component: evaluators Issues re: Specific op evaluators feature request New feature or request

Comments

@p1x31
Copy link
Contributor

p1x31 commented Jan 29, 2022

Alternatives

Additional context

pytorch/pytorch#48019

@p1x31 p1x31 added component: converters Issues re: Specific op converters feature request New feature or request labels Jan 29, 2022
@narendasan
Copy link
Collaborator

What is the actual functionality here? Is it like start + index * step?

@p1x31
Copy link
Contributor Author

p1x31 commented Feb 4, 2022

Yes. An error only occurs when using Torch-TensorRT in Python like this. When compiling with torch.jit.script separately and passing TorchScript module to Torch-TensorRT everything works fine.

@Pikassik
Copy link

Pikassik commented Feb 9, 2022

also faced this problem

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has not seen activity for 90 days, Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days

@narendasan narendasan added component: evaluators Issues re: Specific op evaluators and removed component: converters Issues re: Specific op converters labels May 18, 2022
@narendasan narendasan mentioned this issue Aug 12, 2022
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component: evaluators Issues re: Specific op evaluators feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants