You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please describe.
It would be great if the processor would "know" what gateset it accepts - instead of having to pass that in. I find this rather odd. While there is a way to list processors using the Engine API or the UI, there is no way to tell what gate set a processor accepts. The processor.get_device() method takes a list of gate sets which then it uses to validate operations.
processor = engine.get_processor('rainbow')
# Print the device showing qubit connectivity for the Sycamore gateset.
device = processor.get_device([cg.SYC_GATESET])
Describe the solution you'd like
Instead it would be great if a gate set could be determined based on a processor ID.
Describe alternatives/workarounds you've considered
Alternative is to ask someone, use documentation/datasheets (if available).
What is the urgency from your perspective for this issue? Is it blocking important work?
P3 - I'm not really blocked by it, it is an idea I'd like to discuss / suggestion based on principle
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is your feature request related to a use case or problem? Please describe.
It would be great if the processor would "know" what gateset it accepts - instead of having to pass that in. I find this rather odd. While there is a way to list processors using the Engine API or the UI, there is no way to tell what gate set a processor accepts. The
processor.get_device()
method takes a list of gate sets which then it uses to validate operations.Describe the solution you'd like
Instead it would be great if a gate set could be determined based on a processor ID.
Describe alternatives/workarounds you've considered
Alternative is to ask someone, use documentation/datasheets (if available).
What is the urgency from your perspective for this issue? Is it blocking important work?
P3 - I'm not really blocked by it, it is an idea I'd like to discuss / suggestion based on principle
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: