|
| 1 | + ==================================================== |
| 2 | + IN-KERNEL CACHE OBJECT REPRESENTATION AND MANAGEMENT |
| 3 | + ==================================================== |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +By: David Howells < [email protected]> |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +Contents: |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | + (*) Representation |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + (*) Object management state machine. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | + - Provision of cpu time. |
| 14 | + - Locking simplification. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | + (*) The set of states. |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | + (*) The set of events. |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +============== |
| 22 | +REPRESENTATION |
| 23 | +============== |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +FS-Cache maintains an in-kernel representation of each object that a netfs is |
| 26 | +currently interested in. Such objects are represented by the fscache_cookie |
| 27 | +struct and are referred to as cookies. |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +FS-Cache also maintains a separate in-kernel representation of the objects that |
| 30 | +a cache backend is currently actively caching. Such objects are represented by |
| 31 | +the fscache_object struct. The cache backends allocate these upon request, and |
| 32 | +are expected to embed them in their own representations. These are referred to |
| 33 | +as objects. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +There is a 1:N relationship between cookies and objects. A cookie may be |
| 36 | +represented by multiple objects - an index may exist in more than one cache - |
| 37 | +or even by no objects (it may not be cached). |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +Furthermore, both cookies and objects are hierarchical. The two hierarchies |
| 40 | +correspond, but the cookies tree is a superset of the union of the object trees |
| 41 | +of multiple caches: |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + NETFS INDEX TREE : CACHE 1 : CACHE 2 |
| 44 | + : : |
| 45 | + : +-----------+ : |
| 46 | + +----------->| IObject | : |
| 47 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : |
| 48 | + | ICookie |-------+ : | : |
| 49 | + +-----------+ | : | : +-----------+ |
| 50 | + | +------------------------------>| IObject | |
| 51 | + | : | : +-----------+ |
| 52 | + | : V : | |
| 53 | + | : +-----------+ : | |
| 54 | + V +----------->| IObject | : | |
| 55 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : | |
| 56 | + | ICookie |-------+ : | : V |
| 57 | + +-----------+ | : | : +-----------+ |
| 58 | + | +------------------------------>| IObject | |
| 59 | + +-----+-----+ : | : +-----------+ |
| 60 | + | | : | : | |
| 61 | + V | : V : | |
| 62 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : | |
| 63 | + | ICookie |------------------------->| IObject | : | |
| 64 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : | |
| 65 | + | V : | : V |
| 66 | + | +-----------+ : | : +-----------+ |
| 67 | + | | ICookie |-------------------------------->| IObject | |
| 68 | + | +-----------+ : | : +-----------+ |
| 69 | + V | : V : | |
| 70 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : | |
| 71 | + | DCookie |------------------------->| DObject | : | |
| 72 | + +-----------+ | : +-----------+ : | |
| 73 | + | : : | |
| 74 | + +-------+-------+ : : | |
| 75 | + | | : : | |
| 76 | + V V : : V |
| 77 | + +-----------+ +-----------+ : : +-----------+ |
| 78 | + | DCookie | | DCookie |------------------------>| DObject | |
| 79 | + +-----------+ +-----------+ : : +-----------+ |
| 80 | + : : |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +In the above illustration, ICookie and IObject represent indices and DCookie |
| 83 | +and DObject represent data storage objects. Indices may have representation in |
| 84 | +multiple caches, but currently, non-index objects may not. Objects of any type |
| 85 | +may also be entirely unrepresented. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +As far as the netfs API goes, the netfs is only actually permitted to see |
| 88 | +pointers to the cookies. The cookies themselves and any objects attached to |
| 89 | +those cookies are hidden from it. |
| 90 | + |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +=============================== |
| 93 | +OBJECT MANAGEMENT STATE MACHINE |
| 94 | +=============================== |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +Within FS-Cache, each active object is managed by its own individual state |
| 97 | +machine. The state for an object is kept in the fscache_object struct, in |
| 98 | +object->state. A cookie may point to a set of objects that are in different |
| 99 | +states. |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +Each state has an action associated with it that is invoked when the machine |
| 102 | +wakes up in that state. There are four logical sets of states: |
| 103 | + |
| 104 | + (1) Preparation: states that wait for the parent objects to become ready. The |
| 105 | + representations are hierarchical, and it is expected that an object must |
| 106 | + be created or accessed with respect to its parent object. |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | + (2) Initialisation: states that perform lookups in the cache and validate |
| 109 | + what's found and that create on disk any missing metadata. |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | + (3) Normal running: states that allow netfs operations on objects to proceed |
| 112 | + and that update the state of objects. |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | + (4) Termination: states that detach objects from their netfs cookies, that |
| 115 | + delete objects from disk, that handle disk and system errors and that free |
| 116 | + up in-memory resources. |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +In most cases, transitioning between states is in response to signalled events. |
| 120 | +When a state has finished processing, it will usually set the mask of events in |
| 121 | +which it is interested (object->event_mask) and relinquish the worker thread. |
| 122 | +Then when an event is raised (by calling fscache_raise_event()), if the event |
| 123 | +is not masked, the object will be queued for processing (by calling |
| 124 | +fscache_enqueue_object()). |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +PROVISION OF CPU TIME |
| 128 | +--------------------- |
| 129 | + |
| 130 | +The work to be done by the various states is given CPU time by the threads of |
| 131 | +the slow work facility (see Documentation/slow-work.txt). This is used in |
| 132 | +preference to the workqueue facility because: |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | + (1) Threads may be completely occupied for very long periods of time by a |
| 135 | + particular work item. These state actions may be doing sequences of |
| 136 | + synchronous, journalled disk accesses (lookup, mkdir, create, setxattr, |
| 137 | + getxattr, truncate, unlink, rmdir, rename). |
| 138 | + |
| 139 | + (2) Threads may do little actual work, but may rather spend a lot of time |
| 140 | + sleeping on I/O. This means that single-threaded and 1-per-CPU-threaded |
| 141 | + workqueues don't necessarily have the right numbers of threads. |
| 142 | + |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +LOCKING SIMPLIFICATION |
| 145 | +---------------------- |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +Because only one worker thread may be operating on any particular object's |
| 148 | +state machine at once, this simplifies the locking, particularly with respect |
| 149 | +to disconnecting the netfs's representation of a cache object (fscache_cookie) |
| 150 | +from the cache backend's representation (fscache_object) - which may be |
| 151 | +requested from either end. |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +================= |
| 155 | +THE SET OF STATES |
| 156 | +================= |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | +The object state machine has a set of states that it can be in. There are |
| 159 | +preparation states in which the object sets itself up and waits for its parent |
| 160 | +object to transit to a state that allows access to its children: |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | + (1) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_INIT. |
| 163 | + |
| 164 | + Initialise the object and wait for the parent object to become active. In |
| 165 | + the cache, it is expected that it will not be possible to look an object |
| 166 | + up from the parent object, until that parent object itself has been looked |
| 167 | + up. |
| 168 | + |
| 169 | +There are initialisation states in which the object sets itself up and accesses |
| 170 | +disk for the object metadata: |
| 171 | + |
| 172 | + (2) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_LOOKING_UP. |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | + Look up the object on disk, using the parent as a starting point. |
| 175 | + FS-Cache expects the cache backend to probe the cache to see whether this |
| 176 | + object is represented there, and if it is, to see if it's valid (coherency |
| 177 | + management). |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | + The cache should call fscache_object_lookup_negative() to indicate lookup |
| 180 | + failure for whatever reason, and should call fscache_obtained_object() to |
| 181 | + indicate success. |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | + At the completion of lookup, FS-Cache will let the netfs go ahead with |
| 184 | + read operations, no matter whether the file is yet cached. If not yet |
| 185 | + cached, read operations will be immediately rejected with ENODATA until |
| 186 | + the first known page is uncached - as to that point there can be no data |
| 187 | + to be read out of the cache for that file that isn't currently also held |
| 188 | + in the pagecache. |
| 189 | + |
| 190 | + (3) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_CREATING. |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | + Create an object on disk, using the parent as a starting point. This |
| 193 | + happens if the lookup failed to find the object, or if the object's |
| 194 | + coherency data indicated what's on disk is out of date. In this state, |
| 195 | + FS-Cache expects the cache to create |
| 196 | + |
| 197 | + The cache should call fscache_obtained_object() if creation completes |
| 198 | + successfully, fscache_object_lookup_negative() otherwise. |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | + At the completion of creation, FS-Cache will start processing write |
| 201 | + operations the netfs has queued for an object. If creation failed, the |
| 202 | + write ops will be transparently discarded, and nothing recorded in the |
| 203 | + cache. |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +There are some normal running states in which the object spends its time |
| 206 | +servicing netfs requests: |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | + (4) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_AVAILABLE. |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | + A transient state in which pending operations are started, child objects |
| 211 | + are permitted to advance from FSCACHE_OBJECT_INIT state, and temporary |
| 212 | + lookup data is freed. |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | + (5) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_ACTIVE. |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | + The normal running state. In this state, requests the netfs makes will be |
| 217 | + passed on to the cache. |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | + (6) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_UPDATING. |
| 220 | + |
| 221 | + The state machine comes here to update the object in the cache from the |
| 222 | + netfs's records. This involves updating the auxiliary data that is used |
| 223 | + to maintain coherency. |
| 224 | + |
| 225 | +And there are terminal states in which an object cleans itself up, deallocates |
| 226 | +memory and potentially deletes stuff from disk: |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | + (7) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_LC_DYING. |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | + The object comes here if it is dying because of a lookup or creation |
| 231 | + error. This would be due to a disk error or system error of some sort. |
| 232 | + Temporary data is cleaned up, and the parent is released. |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | + (8) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_DYING. |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | + The object comes here if it is dying due to an error, because its parent |
| 237 | + cookie has been relinquished by the netfs or because the cache is being |
| 238 | + withdrawn. |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | + Any child objects waiting on this one are given CPU time so that they too |
| 241 | + can destroy themselves. This object waits for all its children to go away |
| 242 | + before advancing to the next state. |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | + (9) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_ABORT_INIT. |
| 245 | + |
| 246 | + The object comes to this state if it was waiting on its parent in |
| 247 | + FSCACHE_OBJECT_INIT, but its parent died. The object will destroy itself |
| 248 | + so that the parent may proceed from the FSCACHE_OBJECT_DYING state. |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | +(10) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_RELEASING. |
| 251 | +(11) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_RECYCLING. |
| 252 | + |
| 253 | + The object comes to one of these two states when dying once it is rid of |
| 254 | + all its children, if it is dying because the netfs relinquished its |
| 255 | + cookie. In the first state, the cached data is expected to persist, and |
| 256 | + in the second it will be deleted. |
| 257 | + |
| 258 | +(12) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_WITHDRAWING. |
| 259 | + |
| 260 | + The object transits to this state if the cache decides it wants to |
| 261 | + withdraw the object from service, perhaps to make space, but also due to |
| 262 | + error or just because the whole cache is being withdrawn. |
| 263 | + |
| 264 | +(13) State FSCACHE_OBJECT_DEAD. |
| 265 | + |
| 266 | + The object transits to this state when the in-memory object record is |
| 267 | + ready to be deleted. The object processor shouldn't ever see an object in |
| 268 | + this state. |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | + |
| 271 | +THE SET OF EVENTS |
| 272 | +----------------- |
| 273 | + |
| 274 | +There are a number of events that can be raised to an object state machine: |
| 275 | + |
| 276 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_UPDATE |
| 277 | + |
| 278 | + The netfs requested that an object be updated. The state machine will ask |
| 279 | + the cache backend to update the object, and the cache backend will ask the |
| 280 | + netfs for details of the change through its cookie definition ops. |
| 281 | + |
| 282 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_CLEARED |
| 283 | + |
| 284 | + This is signalled in two circumstances: |
| 285 | + |
| 286 | + (a) when an object's last child object is dropped and |
| 287 | + |
| 288 | + (b) when the last operation outstanding on an object is completed. |
| 289 | + |
| 290 | + This is used to proceed from the dying state. |
| 291 | + |
| 292 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_ERROR |
| 293 | + |
| 294 | + This is signalled when an I/O error occurs during the processing of some |
| 295 | + object. |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_RELEASE |
| 298 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_RETIRE |
| 299 | + |
| 300 | + These are signalled when the netfs relinquishes a cookie it was using. |
| 301 | + The event selected depends on whether the netfs asks for the backing |
| 302 | + object to be retired (deleted) or retained. |
| 303 | + |
| 304 | + (*) FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_WITHDRAW |
| 305 | + |
| 306 | + This is signalled when the cache backend wants to withdraw an object. |
| 307 | + This means that the object will have to be detached from the netfs's |
| 308 | + cookie. |
| 309 | + |
| 310 | +Because the withdrawing releasing/retiring events are all handled by the object |
| 311 | +state machine, it doesn't matter if there's a collision with both ends trying |
| 312 | +to sever the connection at the same time. The state machine can just pick |
| 313 | +which one it wants to honour, and that effects the other. |
0 commit comments