Unrolled build for rust-lang#140678

Rollup merge of rust-lang#140678 - compiler-errors:dont-ice-on-infer-in-upvar, r=lcnr

Be a bit more relaxed about not yet constrained infer vars in closure upvar analysis

See the writeup in `tests/ui/closures/opaque-upvar.rs`.

TL;DR is that this has to do with the fact that the recursive revealing uses, which have not yet been constrained from the defining use by the time that closure upvar inference is performed, remain as infer vars during upvar analysis. We don't really care, though, since anywhere we structurally match on a type in upvar analysis, we already call `structurally_resolve_type` right before `.kind()`, which would emit a true ambiguity error.

Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#197

r? lcnr

Author: rust-timer

compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr_use_visitor.rs

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ pub trait TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> {
 
     fn resolve_vars_if_possible<T: TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(&self, t: T) -> T;
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx>;
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx>;
 
     fn report_bug(&self, span: Span, msg: impl ToString) -> Self::Error;
 
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> for &FnCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
         self.infcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(t)
     }
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, sp: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
-        (**self).try_structurally_resolve_type(sp, ty)
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, sp: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
+        (**self).structurally_resolve_type(sp, ty)
     }
 
     fn report_bug(&self, span: Span, msg: impl ToString) -> Self::Error {
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx> for (&LateContext<'tcx>, LocalDefId) {
         self.0.maybe_typeck_results().expect("expected typeck results")
     }
 
-    fn try_structurally_resolve_type(&self, _span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
+    fn structurally_resolve_type(&self, _span: Span, ty: Ty<'tcx>) -> Ty<'tcx> {
         // FIXME: Maybe need to normalize here.
         ty
     }
@@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
 
         // Select just those fields of the `with`
         // expression that will actually be used
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(with_expr.span, with_place.place.ty()).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(with_expr.span, with_place.place.ty()).kind() {
             ty::Adt(adt, args) if adt.is_struct() => {
                 // Consume those fields of the with expression that are needed.
                 for (f_index, with_field) in adt.non_enum_variant().fields.iter_enumerated() {
@@ -1176,7 +1176,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
 /// two operations: a dereference to reach the array data and then an index to
 /// jump forward to the relevant item.
 impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx, Cx, D> {
-    fn resolve_type_vars_or_bug(
+    fn expect_and_resolve_type(
         &self,
         id: HirId,
         ty: Option<Ty<'tcx>>,
@@ -1185,12 +1185,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             Some(ty) => {
                 let ty = self.cx.resolve_vars_if_possible(ty);
                 self.cx.error_reported_in_ty(ty)?;
-                if ty.is_ty_var() {
-                    debug!("resolve_type_vars_or_bug: infer var from {:?}", ty);
-                    Err(self.cx.report_bug(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(id), "encountered type variable"))
-                } else {
-                    Ok(ty)
-                }
+                Ok(ty)
             }
             None => {
                 // FIXME: We shouldn't be relying on the infcx being tainted.
@@ -1201,15 +1196,15 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     }
 
     fn node_ty(&self, hir_id: HirId) -> Result<Ty<'tcx>, Cx::Error> {
-        self.resolve_type_vars_or_bug(hir_id, self.cx.typeck_results().node_type_opt(hir_id))
+        self.expect_and_resolve_type(hir_id, self.cx.typeck_results().node_type_opt(hir_id))
     }
 
     fn expr_ty(&self, expr: &hir::Expr<'_>) -> Result<Ty<'tcx>, Cx::Error> {
-        self.resolve_type_vars_or_bug(expr.hir_id, self.cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_opt(expr))
+        self.expect_and_resolve_type(expr.hir_id, self.cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_opt(expr))
     }
 
     fn expr_ty_adjusted(&self, expr: &hir::Expr<'_>) -> Result<Ty<'tcx>, Cx::Error> {
-        self.resolve_type_vars_or_bug(
+        self.expect_and_resolve_type(
             expr.hir_id,
             self.cx.typeck_results().expr_ty_adjusted_opt(expr),
         )
@@ -1264,10 +1259,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
                     // a bind-by-ref means that the base_ty will be the type of the ident itself,
                     // but what we want here is the type of the underlying value being borrowed.
                     // So peel off one-level, turning the &T into T.
-                    match self
-                        .cx
-                        .try_structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, base_ty)
-                        .builtin_deref(false)
+                    match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, base_ty).builtin_deref(false)
                     {
                         Some(ty) => Ok(ty),
                         None => {
@@ -1513,10 +1505,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             if node_ty != place_ty
                 && self
                     .cx
-                    .try_structurally_resolve_type(
-                        self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id),
-                        place_ty,
-                    )
+                    .structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), place_ty)
                     .is_impl_trait()
             {
                 projections.push(Projection { kind: ProjectionKind::OpaqueCast, ty: node_ty });
@@ -1538,7 +1527,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         let base_ty = self.expr_ty_adjusted(base)?;
 
         let ty::Ref(region, _, mutbl) =
-            *self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(base.span, base_ty).kind()
+            *self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(base.span, base_ty).kind()
         else {
             span_bug!(expr.span, "cat_overloaded_place: base is not a reference");
         };
@@ -1556,7 +1545,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         let base_curr_ty = base_place.place.ty();
         let deref_ty = match self
             .cx
-            .try_structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), base_curr_ty)
+            .structurally_resolve_type(self.cx.tcx().hir_span(base_place.hir_id), base_curr_ty)
             .builtin_deref(true)
         {
             Some(ty) => ty,
@@ -1584,7 +1573,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     ) -> Result<VariantIdx, Cx::Error> {
         let res = self.cx.typeck_results().qpath_res(qpath, pat_hir_id);
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        let ty::Adt(adt_def, _) = self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() else {
+        let ty::Adt(adt_def, _) = self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() else {
             return Err(self
                 .cx
                 .report_bug(span, "struct or tuple struct pattern not applied to an ADT"));
@@ -1616,7 +1605,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
         span: Span,
     ) -> Result<usize, Cx::Error> {
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             ty::Adt(adt_def, _) => Ok(adt_def.variant(variant_index).fields.len()),
             _ => {
                 self.cx
@@ -1631,7 +1620,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     /// Here `pat_hir_id` is the HirId of the pattern itself.
     fn total_fields_in_tuple(&self, pat_hir_id: HirId, span: Span) -> Result<usize, Cx::Error> {
         let ty = self.cx.typeck_results().node_type(pat_hir_id);
-        match self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        match self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             ty::Tuple(args) => Ok(args.len()),
             _ => Err(self.cx.report_bug(span, "tuple pattern not applied to a tuple")),
         }
@@ -1820,7 +1809,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
             PatKind::Slice(before, ref slice, after) => {
                 let Some(element_ty) = self
                     .cx
-                    .try_structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, place_with_id.place.ty())
+                    .structurally_resolve_type(pat.span, place_with_id.place.ty())
                     .builtin_index()
                 else {
                     debug!("explicit index of non-indexable type {:?}", place_with_id);
@@ -1890,7 +1879,7 @@ impl<'tcx, Cx: TypeInformationCtxt<'tcx>, D: Delegate<'tcx>> ExprUseVisitor<'tcx
     }
 
     fn is_multivariant_adt(&self, ty: Ty<'tcx>, span: Span) -> bool {
-        if let ty::Adt(def, _) = self.cx.try_structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
+        if let ty::Adt(def, _) = self.cx.structurally_resolve_type(span, ty).kind() {
             // Note that if a non-exhaustive SingleVariant is defined in another crate, we need
             // to assume that more cases will be added to the variant in the future. This mean
             // that we should handle non-exhaustive SingleVariant the same way we would handle

tests/crashes/131758.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+//@ check-pass
+//@ revisions: current next
+//@ ignore-compare-mode-next-solver (explicit revisions)
+//@[next] compile-flags: -Znext-solver
+
+// Regression test for <https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/197>.
+// This is only an issue in the new solver, but I'm testing it in both solvers for now.
+// This has to do with the fact that the recursive `walk_dir` is a revealing use, which has not
+// yet been constrained from the defining use by the time that closure signature inference is
+// performed. We don't really care, though, since anywhere we structurally match on a type in
+// upvar analysis, we already call `structurally_resolve_type` right before `.kind()`.
+
+fn walk_dir(cb: &()) -> impl Sized {
+    || {
+        let fut = walk_dir(cb);
+    };
+}
+
+fn main() {}

tests/ui/closures/opaque-upvar.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+#![feature(unboxed_closures)]
+
+//@ check-pass
+
+// Regression test for #131758. We only know the type of `x` after closure upvar
+// inference is done, even if we don't need to structurally resolve the type of `x`.
+
+trait Foo {}
+
+impl<T: Fn<(i32,)>> Foo for T {}
+
+fn baz<T: Foo>(_: T) {}
+
+fn main() {
+    baz(|x| ());
+}