Rollup merge of #104912 - RalfJung:per, r=Mark-Simulacrum

PartialEq: PERs are homogeneous

PartialEq claims that it corresponds to a PER, but that is only a well-defined statement when `Rhs == Self`. There is no standard notion of PER on a relation between two different sets/types. So move this out of the first paragraph and clarify this.

Author: matthiaskrgr

library/core/src/cmp.rs

@@ -29,15 +29,16 @@ use crate::marker::StructuralPartialEq;
 
 use self::Ordering::*;
 
-/// Trait for equality comparisons which are [partial equivalence
-/// relations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_equivalence_relation).
+/// Trait for equality comparisons.
 ///
 /// `x.eq(y)` can also be written `x == y`, and `x.ne(y)` can be written `x != y`.
 /// We use the easier-to-read infix notation in the remainder of this documentation.
 ///
 /// This trait allows for partial equality, for types that do not have a full
 /// equivalence relation. For example, in floating point numbers `NaN != NaN`,
 /// so floating point types implement `PartialEq` but not [`trait@Eq`].
+/// Formally speaking, when `Rhs == Self`, this trait corresponds to a [partial equivalence
+/// relation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_equivalence_relation).
 ///
 /// Implementations must ensure that `eq` and `ne` are consistent with each other:
 ///